Let’s be honest: the word gentrification rarely shows up to the party without someone rolling their eyes or sharpening a pitchfork. It’s become shorthand for artisan bakeries replacing corner shops, brutalist pubs turned minimal bars, creatives priced out by the commercialised remnants of their own energy.
But is it all bad?
Can something that improves infrastructure, attracts investment, and reduces crime also have a justifiable place in the future of our cities?
We’ll tread carefully. Because this isn’t just about flats and flat whites – it’s about who belongs where, and who decides.
Soundtrack your scroll!
Plug into our Play & Read Experience™ — a gentrification-inspired playlist curated by GAWP to match the mood, mirror the tension, and echo the changing streets.
Now, Let’s Define the Terrain…
At its core, gentrification is the transformation of a neighbourhood through an influx of more affluent residents. This process often brings rising property values, renovation of buildings, new businesses, and depending on your lens – either welcome revitalisation or cultural erasure
The term gentrification was coined in 1964 by Ruth Glass, a British urban sociologist who was born in Berlin and fled Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
Working at University College London, she observed dramatic shifts in inner-city neighbourhoods and gave a name to what she saw unfolding. “Once this process of ‘gentrification’ starts in a district,” she wrote in London: Aspects of Change, “it goes on until all or most of the original working-class occupiers are displaced, and the whole social character of the district is changed.”
Glass attributed this to growing state support for private real estate and the loosening of rent controls — a warning shot as postwar affluence began to redraw social lines, not erase them.
More than half a century later, her diagnosis remains chillingly relevant.
It’s easy to reduce it to a villain narrative: rich move in, poor move out. But cities are ecosystems, not static museums. They breathe, shift, expand, contract. The question is: who’s holding the oxygen mask?
The Good Stuff – on Paper, at Least
Gentrification can lead to better public services, investment in schools, cleaner streets, and decreased crime rates. Areas once ignored by councils or dismissed by developers become hubs of opportunity. Take Brixton’s Electric Avenue or Liverpool’s Baltic Triangle. Ten years ago: forgotten. Now: focal points. Jobs, footfall, enterprise = all good things, right?
In many cases, it’s artists, designers, musicians – the people who move in first, drawn by affordable rents and raw charm. The creativity follows. Then the coffee. Then the capital. But by the time the money really arrives, those early pioneers are often priced out. There’s irony, if not tragedy in that.
The Cultural Tax
Here’s the issue: gentrification often isn’t regeneration – it’s replacement. Communities built over decades can be pushed aside in months. Longstanding residents find their rents doubled. Local businesses are elbowed out by trend-chasing chains or ‘concept stores’. A Caribbean food shop becomes a dog treat boutique. A generational grocer turns into a vegan candle studio. That’s not progress. That’s pastiche.
What gets sold as “vibrancy” often means a sanitised, commodified version of culture, stripped of its roots. You can’t buy authenticity – but you can force it out and sell the echo.
Who Is It For?
The truth is: it depends who’s doing the gentrifying. Community-led change – driven by residents, co-ops, local creatives – can be empowering. But when driven purely by profit, it becomes extractive. The land is seen not as a living place, but as an asset class. In that context, every public mural is a teaser for luxury flats, every pop-up a prelude to eviction.
What if we flipped the script? What if gentrification wasn’t something done to a neighbourhood, but with it?
Imagine councils giving existing residents first dibs on new housing. Local ownership schemes. Protected rent zones. Artist-in-residence programmes that don’t end in studio evictions. Imagine the tools of gentrification – investment, interest, design – being used intentionally, not incidentally, to benefit those already rooted there.
We love progress. We champion good design. We believe in the power of aesthetics to transform space. But not at the cost of memory. Not at the cost of people. Not when it’s just another version of enclosure – a land grab with better branding – GAWP
Cities should be palimpsests, not clean slates. The layers matter. The noise. The nostalgia. The friction. Culture doesn’t always need to be curated – sometimes it needs to be left alone to bloom on its own terms.
So: is gentrification always bad? No. But if it only benefits newcomers, and never the native soul of a place, then it’s not growth – it’s theft.
Let us know your thoughts…
We would love to hear what you think. Is there such a thing as ethical gentrification? Can creatives lead change without displacing others? What neighbourhoods are doing it right?
Let us know. We’re here to see the whole picture – not just the polished facade.
Here are five strong case studies that explore different angles:
Peckham (South London) – Peckham’s story is classic: artists moved in during the ’90s when rents were low and warehouses plentiful. The Bussey Building became a cultural landmark, and rooftop cinemas, galleries, and artisan bakeries followed. But now, the very culture that drew people in is under threat from development. Long-standing Afro-Caribbean communities feel pushed out. Rye Lane is morphing fast.
⸻
Portobello Road (West London) – Once the bohemian heart of Notting Hill, Portobello was a melting pot of Caribbean and working-class life. The market still buzzes, but much of the soul has been bleached by global capital and film-fuelled romanticism. Locals have fought tooth and nail against developments like the Newcombe House project, arguing that gentrification here has erased more than it’s added.
⸻
Ancoats (Manchester) – Once a post-industrial husk, Ancoats is now billed as one of the UK’s coolest neighbourhoods. It’s got the canals, the exposed brick, the sourdough scene. But Manchester Council took a different approach — they controlled parts of the regeneration, integrating social housing and protecting green space. Some argue it’s a rare example of positive gentrification.
⸻
Toxteth (Liverpool) – Toxteth carries the scars of neglect and rebellion — and now, the tension of potential gentrification. Baltic Triangle nearby has exploded into a creative tech and nightlife hub, but just a few streets over, residents in Toxteth watch rents rise without seeing the benefits. Regeneration plans exist, but there’s fear it’ll just be spillover gentrification in slow motion.
⸻
Margate (Kent) Once forgotten, now booming — thanks to artists, London leavers, and the Turner Contemporary. Vintage shops, galleries, and hip hotels line the seafront. But behind the boutiques, many locals still struggle with poverty and housing instability. Some residents say they feel like extras in a film shot in their own town.
Soundtrack your scroll.
Plug into our Play & Read Experience™ — a gentrification-inspired playlist curated by GAWP to match the mood, mirror the tension, and echo the changing streets.